Re: [Python-ideas] PEP 428: poll about the joining syntax

Reducing to numeric votes:

p[q]: -1 (confusing w.r.t to indexing/slicing, not convinced it is needed) p + q : -1 (confusing w.r.t to strings, not convinced it is needed) p / q : -0 (not convinced it is needed) p.join(q): -0 (confusing w.r.t strings) p.joinpath(q): +1 (avoids confusion, path.py precedent, need a method API anyway)

Cheers, Nick.