On 3 November 2016 at 23:06, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:35:07PM -0700, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:00 PM, MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
> > self.an_arg = the_default if an_arg is None else an_arg
> > No, ?? is a bit like 'or', except that only None is falsey, so it would be:
> >
> >     self.an_arg = an_arg ?? the_default
> thanks! and actually, that reads much better to me.

That suggests a possible different colour for this operator: `?or`.

(Apologies if that's already been suggested and rejected earlier.)

The None-aware "safe navigation" operators ?. and ?[] will be used where
Python already uses punctuation:

    spam.eggs  # ordinary attribute lookup
    spam?.eggs  # None-aware attribute lookup

    spam[eggs]  # ordinary item lookup
    spam?[eggs]  # None-aware item lookup

which is simple enough to remember: just prefix your usual operator with
a question mark to make it None-aware. But one of the disadvantages of
?? as an operator is that it replaces a keyword with completely
unrelated punctuation:

    spam or default  # default only if spam is any Falsey value
    spam ?? default  # default only if spam is None

Compared to:

    spam ?or default

gives us the same rule: prefix the `or` operator with ? to make it None-

Agree 100%.  Prefixing an operator with ? meaning that it becomes None-aware is easy to remember.  Just think of `?or` the same as `or`, but while `or` is truth-aware, `?or` would be None-aware.  Similarly to other operators like . and [].

How many times have I  wanted to do something like `foo or bar`, but then again this is not always correct in case foo is an object that can be true or false, in which case it  has to be expanded to `foo if foo is not None else bar`.  With the proposal, we could write `foo ?or bar`, which is intuitively similar to the well known `foo or bar` expression and therefore easy to pick up.

Python-ideas mailing list
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
Gambit Research
"The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert