Le 21/03/2016 17:34, Chris Barker a écrit :
I've taught enough and I'm sure everyone else here has too, to know that the "else" in a for loop in non-intuitive to a lot of folks. And maybe a different keyword would have been clearer. But it is what it is, could we keep this discussion to the proposed addition?
+1 I would love "else" semantics to be changed as well, but we can't. What about: for x in stuff: foo(x) or: bar() It's a bit weird when you read it the first time, but: - It conveys pretty well the intent. - While it still closes to the original "or" semantics, you can't confuse this syntax with the other syntax for "or". - I can't think of a use case where the parser can find that ambigious. - It's short.
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@noaa.gov mailto:Chris.Barker@noaa.gov
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/