Shreyan Avigyan writes:
My Browser showed "No results" and a windows error sound could be heard. I couldn't find the PEP. If I did I would have studied a lot. I didn't have any idea this idea was proposed before and also had a PEP (unfortunately rejected)
You're very close to the leading edge with some of your proposals. What Chris is suggesting is that several of the ideas you've proposed have had PEPs, or related ideas have had PEPs, so you would benefit from just reading the list of PEPs. I think about half are informational or adopted, you can focus on the rest. While you're there, if there are some that are particularly interesting, you can check status and see why the ones that didn't get accepted failed. Also, your Google-fu will improve. I don't know where you searched or what the engine is, but "no results" is not a response I would expect. I searched "try except pep python" at Google and got these top results, in this order: PEP 463 -- Exception-catching expressions | Python.org PEP 341 -- Unifying try-except and try-finally | Python.org PEP 654 -- Exception Groups and except* | Python.org PEP 3110 -- Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 | Python.org PEP8 Does Not Allow Try Except Block - Stack Overflow Now, I search PEPs fairly often (maybe once every week or two), so maybe Google will do a better job for me than for you. But just reading the (very long) list of titles will provide you with a pile of search keys. I also tried that query at DuckDuckGo. It wasn't quite as helpful, but 4 of the 5 above were in the top 10, with PEP 463 at #10 but at least it was on the first page. Regards, Steve