On Feb 11, 2015, at 2:21 AM, Ian Lee <ianlee1521@gmail.com> wrote:

I mentioned this on the python-dev list [1] originally as a +1 to someone else suggesting the idea [2]. It also came up in a response to my post that I can't seem to find in the archives, so I've quoted it below [3].

As the subject says, the idea would be to add a "+" and "+=" operator to dict that would provide the following behavior:

>>> {'x': 1, 'y': 2} + {'z': 3}
{'x': 1, 'y': 2, 'z': 3}

With the only potentially non obvious case I can see then is when there are duplicate keys, in which case the syntax could just be defined that last setter wins, e.g.:

>>> {'x': 1, 'y': 2} + {'x': 3}
{'x': 3, 'y': 2}

Which is analogous to the example:

>>> new_dict = dict1.copy()
>>> new_dict.update(dict2)

With "+=" then essentially ending up being an alias for ``dict.update(...)``.

I'd be happy to champion this as a PEP if the feedback / public opinion heads in that direction. 


[2] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138116.html
[3] John Wong -- 
Well looking at just list
a + b yields new list
a += b yields modified a
then there is also .extend in list. etc.  
so do we want to follow list's footstep? I like + because + is more natural to read. Maybe this needs to be a separate thread. I am actually amazed to remember dict + dict is not possible... there must be a reason (performance??) for this...


I’d really like this change and I think that it makes sense. The only thing I’d change is that I think the | operator makes more sense than +. dicts are more like sets than they are like lists so a union operator makes more sense I think.

---
Donald Stufft
PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA