On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Guido van Rossum
wrote: But you're still stuck with implementing the names that someone else decided upon a decade ago... :-)
And why is that a bad thing? I don't see the value in having something like: thing.set_data_received_callback(self.bake_some_eggs)
But I do, and you've pinpointed exactly my argument. My code is all about baking an egg, and (from my POV) it's secondary that it's invoked by the reactor when data is received.
We're going to have to give *something* a name, eventually. Why not pick it at the most direct level?
Let the reactor pick *its* names (e.g. set_data_received_callback). Then I can pick mine. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)