I'm not usually swayed by surveys -- Python is not a democracy. Maybe a bunch of longer examples would help all of us see the advantages of the proposals. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Mark E. Haase <mehaase@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
I propose that the next phase of the process should be to pick the best operator for each sub-proposal. Then we can decide which of the sub-proposals we actually want in the language, based on a combination of how important the functionality is and how acceptable we find the spelling.
--Guido
I just submitted an updated PEP that removes the emoijs and some other cruft.
How I can help with this next phase? Is a survey a good idea or a bad idea?
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)