On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:29, Patrick Laban <laban.patrick@gmail.com> wrote:
Please forgive me if anything I say has already been mentioned.  I am certainly in support of a moratorium on Python core and switch the focus to Python libraries.  I'm sure others have noticed that as of late many proposals have been of lower quality or are the same old ideas that keep getting requested.

My only concern would be that the technology field is always changing and some great new technologies may come up during the moratorium.  To alleviate this concern I propose that the primary Python core developers either meet once a year, or at the halfway point of the moratorium.  They would then discuss whether or not any changes within the field are major enough to warrant a change within Python core.


We already meet once a year at PyCon US and since last year instigated a language summit so we can just discuss things.

But a moratorium is a moratorium. This is an all-or-nothing approach. As Guido has said, add gray area to it and suddenly everyone is trying to get their feature in. I really don't think going a release or two w/o changes to the language is going to make Python obsolete. We already have features in 3.x that people just don't know about because they have not started using it yet.

-Brett