On 7 November 2011 23:05, Michael Foord <fuzzyman@gmail.com> wrote:


On 7 November 2011 21:43, Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> wrote:


On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote:
I wrote, naively:
| > I presume StopIteration would get instantiated to a singleton, like
| > NoneType to None? Just asking.

On 07Nov2011 22:01, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
| Even without the traceback issue Antoine mentioned, it's already the
| case that StopIteration isn't a singleton in 2.x. Various pieces of
| code (e.g. contextlib.contextmanager) rely on being able to tell
| whether they're getting a specific StopIteration instance back or a
| new one.

Interesting.

Off topic digression:

I've been slightly uncomfortable about exceptions as control flow for a
while, basicly when writing code like this:

 try:
   x = G.next()
 except StopIteration:
   # G is empty!

in that I don't entirely know that the StopIteration came from G of from
some buggy code deeper inside G that let a StopIteration out, eg by
mangling a try/except like the above. In most circumstances with other
exceptions, while you might _expect_ the exception to come from the
source you expect you don't care so much because it will indicate
failure of the operation anyway. Report or die, you don't proceed as if
the op was good. But with StopIteration one is reading "G is empty"
directly into the situation and acting as though it is normal (exit the
event loop or whatever it may imply).

Agreed.  Use of exceptions for this in the language feels like it was a convenient way to do it but as the conditions aren't really exceptional at all it'd be nice if there were a lighter weight mechanism that could skip the unneeded parts of the exception raising and handling mechanism for the implementation.  We don't need the traceback to be stored in these situations.

This existing logic to instantiate and associate the traceback with it only if caught is one way to implement doing exactly that. Any other ideas?

Hackish things like a class attribute on classes being raised as an exception, or a LightweightException class being part of its class heirarchy used to signify if that exception should take the full path or the fast path come to mind but could be considered equally surprising.

I'm not sure any of this is worth it but it would simplify the eval loop.  We're speaking implementation details of CPython here, not an actual change to the language itself. (*)

-gps

(*) Please beat anybody who writes code that depends on this somewhat odd exception instantiation timing behavior side effect over the head with a frozen herring.


Having the interpreter instantiate the exception for you allows you to do wonderful things like this:

>>> class Foo(Exception):
...  def __new__(cls, *args):
...   return object()
... 
>>> try:
...  raise Foo
... except Exception as e:
...  print (e)
... 
<object object at 0x100634280>

(I know this has nothing to do with the topic being debated but for some reason this code tickles me. Plus it used to segfault Python 3...)


Ooh... this one segfaults Python 3.2 - I wonder if that's been fixed yet.

>>> class Foo(Exception):
...  def __new__(cls, *args):
...   return 'string exception'
... 
>>> try:
...  raise Foo
... except Exception as e:
...  print (e)
... 
Segmentation fault: 11

All the best,

Michael Foord
 

All the best,


Michael

 



On 07Nov2011 11:35, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
| It is impossible to use singletons for exception instances now that the
| traceback is stored on them.

Ah. I had somehow thought the exception itself and the traceback were
distinct items, presented in a tuple.

On 07Nov2011 21:15, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
| Are you asking about what it should be, or what it is?

The former.

| Either way:
| >>> a = StopIteration('spam')
| >>> b = StopIteration('ham')
| >>> a is b
| False

Since my question was about the proposed new behaviour when just a type
was raised, the above test wouldn't educate me. Though it does address the
behaviour of the type instantation in general.

Cheers,
Carpe Datum     - John Sloan <jsloan@ncar.ucar.edu>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas


_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas




--
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/

May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html




--
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/

May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html