22 Sep
2016
22 Sep
'16
8:04 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:02 PM David Mertz
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:59 PM, אלעזר
wrote: I don't If this feature is "nice, but does not worth the complication",
then so be it; I can't claim I know better. I only speculate that it does not necessarily requires a new custom type.
I don't mean a runtime type here (necessarily), but rather a new type for the parser. I.e. transform this actual expression into some sort of delayed expression when parsing.
I understood this, and that was my speculation. I will like an explanation as to why is this necessary, but it's probably off topic.
Elazar