21 Jul
2012
21 Jul
'12
7:36 p.m.
On 21.07.12 14:19, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I'm glad that it's clear to someone, because to me the straight-forward, literal meaning of Masklinn's explanation (that Python 3 has a character type, and they're integers) is wrong.
Yes, but Masklinn did not claim this.