27 Apr
2020
27 Apr
'20
3:04 p.m.
On 04/26/2020 08:56 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
that seems not very "there's only one way to do it" to me.
The quote is "one obvious way".
It almost feels like the proponents of the new mode/function are hoping to avoid the processing that might need to be "rolled back" in some manner if there is a synchronization problem.
There is no way to "roll back" an iterator, unless you are writing custom ones -- in which case you'll need a custom zip to do the rolling back. -- ~Ethan~