This argument pretty much kills the proposal.

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 9:01 AM Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas <python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
To my mind there are too many differences between running code as a
script and running it in the REPL.  This would, presumably, add another
one: the initial line would be executed without waiting to see if there
is a dot continuation line.  And it just feels wrong to have a complete
syntactically valid line of code ... not be a complete line of code. 
You can always add outer brackets, as in other situations where lines of
code become over-long:

  y = (x.rstrip("\n")
        .split(":")[0]
        .lower())

-1
Rob Cliffe

On 12/03/2021 15:32, Matt Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's becoming more popular in Python to have interfaces which are built around method chaining as a way of applying operations to data. For example in pandas is moving more towards a default model where methods do not change the object in-place but instead return an altered version (or at least an altered view) of it.
>
> The major downside to method chaining is that it ends up creating long lines of code which can become hard to read. The two main solutions to this are 1) break down the chain and give the steps their own variable names and 2) split it over multiple lines using `\` as a line continuation.
>
> e.g.:
>
>    y = x.rstrip("\n").split(":")[0].lower()
>
> would become
>
>    y = x.rstrip("\n") \
>         .split(":")[0] \
>         .lower()
>
> I find the continuation character visually distracting, easy to forget and does not allow for line-by-line commenting (causing `SyntaxError: unexpected character after line continuation character`):
>
>    y = x.rstrip("\n") \
>         .split(":")[0] \  # grab the key name
>         .lower()
>
> My idea is to alter the syntax of Python to allow doing:
>
>    y = x.rstrip("\n")
>         .split(":")[0]
>         .lower()
>
> i.e., not requiring an explicit line continuation character in the case where the next line starts with a period.
>
> I've had a search through the archives and I couldn't see this discussion before. Feel free to point me to it if I've missed anything.
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LWB3U5BTGC4CT26U4AB676SKGED3ZOEX/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GVVLTS2EYLB7WKQ625RUOXSQHR3SOQ6E/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/


--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
Pronouns: he/him (why is my pronoun here?)