On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:38 AM Zachary Ware < zachary.ware+pyideas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:28 AM Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pyideas@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's a crazy thought that might be best dismissed out of hand: what about extending 'from name import other_names' to accept any object for <name>? First try to get values via __getitem__() (possibly only for dict/dict subclasses?), next try getattr(), finally try to import the module and pull values from it as per usual.
Pros: - solves dict unpacking
Would it solve nested dict unpacking?
How do you mean? Replacing `some_name = some_dict['some_key']['some_name']` with `from some_dict['some_key'] import some_name`?
No, more like py> {'name': name, 'location': {0: row, 1: col} = mapping py> name, row, col ('Mike', 3, 5)