Peter wrote:
Well you could just do:
z = {a: b for b in (transform(bi) for bi in bs) for a in as_} That works, but I prefer the implicit nesting of a sequence of "comp_for" expressions to a the nested generator. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:16 PM Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik@gmail.com> wrote:
This example shows additional flexibility:
z = {a: transformed_b for b in bs given transformed_b = transform(b) for a in as_}
There is no nice, equivalent := version as far as I can tell.
True. However, it took me several readings to understand what you were doing here. I think I actually prefer "for transformed_b in [transform(b)]" to this syntax, which is saying something.
I feel you. I think of "given" as an assignment that is in front of the expression, just like "for" (in comp_for) is a for loop that is in front, and "if" (in comp_if) is a condition that is in front.
ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
--
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "python-ideas" group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/python-ideas/keaR3FudcwQ/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to python-ideas+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.