July 22, 2018
8:51 a.m.
To get rid of the two other ( ?. And ?[] ), we could also define getitem and getattr for None to always return None...;-) I'm joking, although such an "absorbing" None may have been a good choice when None was introduced, and maybe a way to do an absorbing-None per-statement maybe nice...Nice enough to add more subtleties to python? I don't think so, but it would be readable...