March 17, 2009
12:12 a.m.
I vote we move ahead with Proposal II from PEP 378.
Looks fairly good to me.
Of course this is by now ambiguous -- the latest version of the PEP no longer numbers the versions I and II, and has Nick's version second. (Which may be reversed by the time you read this if Raymond keeps updating the PEP in real time. :-)
To keep the conversation in sync with today's real-time updates, I've put back in the "perma-names", Proposal I (nick's) and Proposal II (eric's). Raymond