8 Feb
2009
8 Feb
'09
8:17 a.m.
Riobard Zhan wrote:
Colons are redundant too because they are precisely equivalent to a newline + a deeper level of indentation.
You have been given many examples showing that this is not true. At best, it is *often* true, but certainly not always. At this point, the horse is not just dead, it has rotted away to a skeleton. I don't believe there is any point continuing to beat it. If anyone other than Riobard thinks differently, please speak up. -- Steven