On Feb 12, 2013, at 02:13 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:Except that sometimes you do, which is why flufl.enum has a nice concise str
>I agree, and Tim's implementation provides a very nice string
>representation, no matter what the value underneath is. I don't really care
>what the value underneath is, actually.
and a more detailed repr. The former doesn't include the underlying value
while the latter does. Edible cake.