Georg Brandl wrote:
To me, this is easier to read (conceptualize), because it simply selects a metafunction, than the current
, which calls a metafunction that creates and returns a metafunction. So I hope it gets added if not too difficult.
I have some sympathy for Guido's position that anything more complicated should be split into two lines. That should be mentioned in the docs whether or not @f[i] is added.