On 8 Mar 2017, at 16:01, Francesco Franchina <cescus92@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm shortly writing to you about a reflection I lately made upon the current functioning of __str__ for the time's class.
Before expressing my thought and proposal, I want to make sure we all agree on a simple and clear fact: the __str__ magic method is used to give a literal and human-readable representation to the object (unlike __repr__).
Generally this is true across the python panorama. It's not true for the time class, for example.
import time a = time.localtime() a.__str__() 'time.struct_time(tm_year=2017, tm_mon=3, tm_mday=8, tm_hour=16, tm_min=6, tm_sec=16, tm_wday=2, tm_yday=67, tm_isdst=0)'
Well, don't get me wrong: the main aim of the __str__ method has been accomplished but, imho, not in the most pythonic way.
I just wanted to ask you: what do you think about re-writing the __str__ of the time class so it would return something like ISO 8601 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601>] format? Wouldn't it be more meaningful? Especially in the JS-everywhere-era it could be more more productive.
TL;DR __str__ for dates should return a human-readable date format (eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601>)
Just use datetime module instead of time?
datetime.datetime.now().isoformat() '2017-03-08T16:14:58.448801'
Barry