On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 22:00, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> wrote:
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@...> writes:
>
> I believe that was Brett's point.

Ah, so you're not suggesting moving imp.source_to_cache() to some
sys.implementation module. Great.

Just FYI, everyone guessed right about what I was thinking and Benjamin is right about not suggesting moving imp.source_to_cache() but simply adding sys.implementation so that imp.source_to_cache() can use that instead of imp.get_tag().