1 Sep
2012
1 Sep
'12
8:56 a.m.
On 01/09/12 16:29, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Idea: Apply function to every element of a sequence and return new sequence. It's more pythonic than map(), because clearly works only as a list method.
I think you mean "less pythonic".
-1
We already have map, and it works lazily on any iterable. Why do we need something less efficient and more limited?
--
Steven