July 8, 2016
4:26 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016, 1:03 AM Franklin? Lee <leewangzhong+python@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 6, 2016 2:40 PM, "Michael Selik" <michael.selik@gmail.com> wrote:
Instead it seems the best way given the current behavior is to write:
len(bytestring) == bytestring.count(b'z')
While I wait for PEP 467, can anyone suggest a better way to write that?
How about set(bytestring) == set(b'z')
Ah, that makes sense. I'd thought of using a set literal on the right-hand, but for some reason using set constructor slipped my mind.