14 Feb
2013
14 Feb
'13
6:11 p.m.
On 02/14/2013 05:19 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
A recurring suggestion for collections.namedtuple is that it would be nice to be able to define them like this [...]
FWIW, I think namedtuple is overused. Not that there's anything innately wrong with namedtuple; it's just that I think too many types are iterable which shouldn't be. (Nobody unpacks the stat_result anymore, that's like 1995 man.) I suggest people use types.SimpleNamespace unless iterability is specifically required. //arry/