Jan. 30, 2013
4:27 p.m.
On Jan 30, 2013, at 08:17 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
Barry, since you've obviously given this issue a lot of thought, maybe you could summarize it in a PEP so we have a clear way of moving forward for 3.4 ?
I'm happy to do so if there's a realistic chance of it being accepted. We already have one rejected enum PEP (354) and we probably don't need two. ;) Cheers, -Barry