I'm torn -- on the one hand, these very old modules may as well stay frozen in time (please double check that they aren't listed in PEP 594)
I expect that will be quite common — older code commonly uses lower case class names
Thank, checking 594 is a good idea; I understand why you are thorn, and I can see how such a change can be seen as noise. But I believe that consistency will be a win in the long run.
It make complete sens to decide whether and how to rename on a per-module basis. But for each module the discussion should likely be on b.p.o.
My original request on bpo was for
re which is actively maintained, but
I was advised to ask for a more general policy and thoughts here as whether renaming of a
an exception was acceptable.
-- Matthias 1: https://bugs.python.org/issue38981