On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/31/11 2:05 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
You didn't get any responses AFAICT. That doesn't mean nobody is interested -- perhaps your proposal is simply too general? Do you feel up to making some more specific recommendations about the exact list of functions to add? It's easier to criticize a concrete proposal. Do you feel up to producing a patch that just adds the incomplete beta function?
It shows up deeply mis-threaded under "Create a StringBuilder class and use it everywhere" in my client. Perhaps Spectral One should try reposting it so that it shows up as a new thread.
What client is that? In my GMail (for once) it shows up as a new thread with subject "Re: [Python-ideas] Expanding statistical functions in Python's std. lib." I guess your client got confused by some of these headers: References: <549901314286114@web119.yandex.ru> <4E56E859.3090504@canterbury.ac.nz> In-Reply-To: <4E56E859.3090504@canterbury.ac.nz> -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)