On Wed Feb 11 2015 at 2:21:59 AM Ian Lee <ianlee1521@gmail.com> wrote:
I mentioned this on the python-dev list [1] originally as a +1 to someone else suggesting the idea [2]. It also came up in a response to my post that I can't seem to find in the archives, so I've quoted it below [3].

As the subject says, the idea would be to add a "+" and "+=" operator to dict that would provide the following behavior:

>>> {'x': 1, 'y': 2} + {'z': 3}
{'x': 1, 'y': 2, 'z': 3}

With the only potentially non obvious case I can see then is when there are duplicate keys, in which case the syntax could just be defined that last setter wins, e.g.:

>>> {'x': 1, 'y': 2} + {'x': 3}
{'x': 3, 'y': 2}

Which is analogous to the example:

>>> new_dict = dict1.copy()
>>> new_dict.update(dict2)

With "+=" then essentially ending up being an alias for ``dict.update(...)``.

I'd be happy to champion this as a PEP if the feedback / public opinion heads in that direction. 

Unless Guido wants to speak up and give some historical context, I think a PEP that finally settled this idea would be good, even if it just ends up being a historical document as to why dicts don't have an __add__ method. Obviously there is a good amount of support both for and against the idea.

-Brett
 


[2] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-February/138116.html
[3] John Wong -- 
Well looking at just list
a + b yields new list
a += b yields modified a
then there is also .extend in list. etc.  
so do we want to follow list's footstep? I like + because + is more natural to read. Maybe this needs to be a separate thread. I am actually amazed to remember dict + dict is not possible... there must be a reason (performance??) for this...

Cheers,

~ Ian Lee
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/