12 Feb
2013
12 Feb
'13
3:31 p.m.
On 02/12/2013 07:21 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
While the parallel thread (and Tim's Bitbucket issue tracker) discusses his proposed implementation, I think it may be worthwhile to start from the other direction by writing a PEP that aims to include this in 3.4. The way I see it, the PEP should discuss and help us settle upon a minimal set of features deemed important in an enum.
If that sounds OK to people, then someone should write that PEP :-) This could be Tim, or Barry who's been maintaining flufl.enum for a long time. If no one steps up, I will gladly do it.
A PEP would be excellent. I tried searching for one a couple days ago to help my understanding with Tim's methods, but sadly didn't find one. :( -- ~Ethan~