
Aug. 7, 2020
4:15 p.m.
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 14:14, Jonathan Fine <jfine2358@gmail.com> wrote:
At present d[1, 2] d[(1, 2)] are semantically equivalent.
There is a proposal, that d[1, 2, a=3, b=4] d[(1, 2), a=3, b=4] be semantically equivalent.
I find this troubling, for example because fn(1, 2, a=3, b=4) fn((1, 2), a=3, b=4) are semantically different.
I think I've understood your point. To be sure, what's the Steven proposal?