> Isn’t the point of having a Code of Conduct that we shouldn’t have to have these arguments? Or, if there is an argument about whether a single figurative use as a word qualifies as “excessive swearing” per the CoC, surely an -ideas thread isn’t the place to have it?

Yeah, I very much doubt that "shitty wrapper" constitutes as excessive swearing. It'd be one thing if the post contained many or was directed at someone else, but the OP was using it to refer to something they personally wrote. Personally, I think it's a non-issue in that sort of context.

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:40 PM Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas <python-ideas@python.org> wrote:

On Feb 18, 2020, at 17:11, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
>
> On 02/18/2020 04:26 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:44:07PM +0000, Rhodri James wrote:
>
>>> Language, sunshine.
>> What about it?
>> Just for the record, I had no issues with Soni's language, but I do
>> object to attempts to shame him for it.
>
> Since when is simply drawing one's attention to something shaming?
>
>> This isn't the Disney Chanel,
>> it's been over 100 years since Victoria was Queen of England, and we're
>> all adults here.
>
> Really? I didn't realize those under the legal age of majority were not allowed on this list.

Isn’t the point of having a Code of Conduct that we shouldn’t have to have these arguments? Or, if there is an argument about whether a single figurative use as a word qualifies as “excessive swearing” per the CoC, surely an -ideas thread isn’t the place to have it?
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GOKPFN55FTAGLB7WJ6B6MOUJ3FLDWBZ7/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/