On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 5:41 PM Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 6/10/2018 10:44 AM, Stephan Houben wrote:

> I would suggest that compatibility with a major Python library such as
> SciPy is more important than compatibility
> with other programming languages.
>
> I would go even further and argue that scipy.special.sindg and its
> friends cosdg and tandg
> can serve as the reference implementation for this proposal.

Or we could decide that we don't need to duplicate scipy.


Copying scipy's and numpy's interface makes vectorizing code a lot simpler.  tensorflow also initially made the mistake of varying from numpy's interface only to then deprecate the variations and adopt the standard.
 

--
Terry Jan Reedy

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "python-ideas" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/python-ideas/-NauPA0ZckE/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to python-ideas+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.