Re: [Python-ideas] Add lookahead iterator (peeker) to itertools

Feb. 25, 2013


      On 2/25/2013 5:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
...
On 25 February 2013 09:51, Wolfgang Maier
<wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
...
Terry Reedy <tjreedy@...> writes:
...
class lookahead():
      "Wrap iterator with lookahead to both peek and test exhausted"
...
+1 That's a nice tool that I'd love to have in itertools.
It's not a bad idea, but I don't like the fact that as written it
turns a finite iterator into an infinite one (returning an endless
sequence of sentinels after  the underlying iterator is exhausted).
This is a bug in this re-write. The corrected .__next__

     def __next__(self):
         if self:
             ret = self.peek
             self._set_peek()
             return ret
         else:
             raise StopIteration()

passes the test with this addition

     try:
         next(it)
         assert False, "Next should have raised StopIteration"
     except StopIteration:
         pass
...
...
...
list(lookahead('abc')) == list('abc')
True
-- 
Terry Jan Reedy