On Oct 15, 2016 9:45 PM, "Greg Ewing" <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> This thread is a huge, multi-day proof that people do not agree that this is a "reasonable" interpretation.
>
>
> So far I've seen one very vocal person who disgrees, and
> maybe one other who isn't sure.

In case it wasn't entirely clear, I strongly and vehemently opposed this unnecessary new syntax. It is confusing, bug prone, and would be difficult to teach.

Or am I that very vocal person? I was thinking your meant Steven.