On Oct 15, 2016 9:45 PM, "Greg Ewing" <email@example.com> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> This thread is a huge, multi-day proof that people do not agree that this is a "reasonable" interpretation.
> So far I've seen one very vocal person who disgrees, and
> maybe one other who isn't sure.
In case it wasn't entirely clear, I strongly and vehemently opposed this unnecessary new syntax. It is confusing, bug prone, and would be difficult to teach.
Or am I that very vocal person? I was thinking your meant Steven.