On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM David Mertz <mertz@gnosis.cx> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020, 5:44 AM Alex HallĀ 
(Heretical question: do we *really* need to distinguish it in syntax? Iterator unpacking a dict seems like a dumb idea, I wouldn't be sad if we broke compatibility there)

Breaking millions of lines of idiomatic code seems like a bad idea.

a, b, c = mydict

Mary not be so very common, but this is ubiquitous:

for k in mydict: ...

What I mean is that maybe `a, b = foo` could first test if `foo` is a mapping, use mapping unpacking if it is, otherwise fall back to regular iterable unpacking. So dicts would remain iterable, but that wouldn't feature in unpacking. Then there wouldn't be a change in syntax, or in other kinds of iteration, just a change in what happens if you unpack a dict.