It's a discussion issue. PEP 554 is trying to focus on the API of subinterpreters and doesn't want to distract from that by bringing the GIL into it.

That being said, the general expectation from everyone involved is there will be a perl-interpreter GIL.

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:31 AM Denis Kotov <redradist@gmail.com> wrote:

Reading PEP554 https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0554/#a-disclaimer-about-the-gil seems like at the current implementation of subinterpretters there will be no separate GIL …

 

But I am wondering, why ?

Each subinterpreter has it own object management and Garbage Collection …

 

Why subinterpreters should share one GIL ?

Is there any technical issues ?

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ZC3WVJKNNIQNQLPLLTMDLU6SHTNYZ4ID/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/H5XRPUVM66KSINNODHIQC5YU6VUOUV3A/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/