On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:07 AM Franklin? Lee
<leewangzhong+python@gmail.com> wrote:
> For example,
>     if (A <: B or A <: C) and A <: D:
> is not much better than
>     if issubclass(A, (B, C)) and issubclass(A, D):
> especially if you don't know what either of those mean. You can search
> for issubclass, but you can't search for <:.

Please can people stop trotting out this tired argument? I just typed
"<:" (without the quotes) into Google - or rather, into my Chrome
omnibar - and the first hit was a Stack Overflow question regarding
the "<:" operator in Scala, the second is Scala documentation about
"Upper Type Bounds" which looks plausible, and then there are a few
others that may or may not be related.

Symbols CAN be searched for, both in Google and in many documentation tools.