On 26.03.2016 19:17, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org> wrote:
Koos Zevenhoven writes:

How about generalizing f-strings, or perhaps giving p-strings (some
of) the power of f-strings?

That'll be a good idea.

Just their combination: pf"{ path_as_string }" ? That would at least be very consistent.

Could be make implicit: p'{my_variable}'