How does a frozendict help in that example? It's not obvious to me.

Despite not understanding that example, I'm +1 for having a frozendict. I don't think it'll increase cognitive load much, as it'll sit right next to frozenset when someone reads the builtins in alphabetical order. In my own experience, I want to use a dict as a dict key about once or twice a year. It'd be nice to have a quick way to convert to a frozendict.

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:05 AM Philip Martin <philip.martin2007@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I first want to thank everyone in the community for the contributions over the years. I know the idea of a frozendict has been proposed before and rejected. I have a use case for a frozendict implementation that to my knowledge was not discussed during previous debates. My reasoning for a frozendict class stems from patterns I typically see arise when performing ETL or data integrations and conversions. I generally have used MappingProxyType as a way to set default mapping to a function or to set an empty mapping to a function. I've created a gist with an example use case:

https://gist.github.com/pmart123/493edf84d9aa61691ca7321325ebb6ab

I've included an example of what code typically looks like when using MappingProxyType and what it could look like with a frozendict implementation. I believe this use case may also be under-reported in open source code as it often crops up when integrating third-party data sources, which at times can't be open sourced due to licensing issues. I would love to hear if anyone has used MappingProxyType in a similar manner, or if this use case could help warrant a frozendict in the standard library.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/