On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 16:46, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> wrote:
02.05.22 08:03, Chris Angelico пише:
Let's not go as far as a PEP yet, and figure out a couple of things:
A PEP is necessary if we add Roman numerals and Cyrillic numerals, and Babylonian cuneiform numerals to the heap.
I'm aware of PEP 313 for Roman, but not for the others. Was there a PEP when the int() constructor started to support other types of digits? I can't find one but it wouldn't surprise me. In any case, I just said "yet" - there's no need to go straight to the PEP stage, even if it's necessary before the matter gets finally decided. (This was said with my PEP Editor hat on; every now and then, we get someone putting a PR on the peps repository to request a change in the language, and it's usually better to thrash things out on a mailing list first.) ChrisA