On 05/06/2020 17:47, Jonathan Fine wrote:
These are very nice statements. What is you actually want?
Good question. Vinay provide a link to the issue he opened. In his opening message he wrote:
This behaviour works well when the file descriptors of these semaphores can be shared with children processes.
But, it doesn't work when an unrelated process which needs access to shared semaphore tries to open it.
Again, these are statements. I can take a guess at what Vinay wants, but since that involves a rather large worm can I'd rather they actually stated it outright.