7 Jan
2016
7 Jan
'16
12:59 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 08:49:55PM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
It makes sense, but I disagree with the suggestion. Having "Latin-1 or UTF-8" as the effective default encoding is not a good idea, IMO;
I'm curious what your reasoning is. That seems to be fairly common behavious with some email clients, for example I seem to recall that Thunderbird will try encoding emails as US-ASCII, if that fails, Latin-1, and only send UTF-8 if the other two don't work. I'm not defending this tactic, but wondering what you have against it. -- Steve