I'm not sure if you're reading the right document, but PEP 634 refers to 636 in its second paragraph

On Tue, 4 May 2021, 19:56 Shreyan Avigyan, <pythonshreyan09@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok. Now I'm able to understand. PEP 634 should have a reference to PEP 636 or else it's pretty hard to understand because the syntax  section demonstrates PEG implementation of this.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/APKN7AV5TLLNSO3EHLK2MBEEBCB5NMEF/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/