Just to clarify, PEP 315 had to do with a do-while concept (to make common use of pre-while code that
often exists) and not  the (dubious) issue of:

for X in listY while conditionZ:

or

for X in listY and conditionZ:

(fwhile)

Right?

There seemed to be some confusion, but maybe they are related, but I'm not sure how....

-Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
To: Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>
Cc: Python-Ideas <python-ideas@python.org>
Sent: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 11:40 am
Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] PEP 315: do-while

On 26 cze 2013, at 17:03, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:

Please reject the PEP. More variations along these lines won't make the language more elegant or easier to learn. They'd just save a few hasty folks some typing while making others who have to read/maintain their code wonder what it means.

Done. PEP 315 has been rejected.


-- 
Best regards,
Łukasz Langa

WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/
Twitter: @llanga
IRC: ambv on #python-dev

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas