This will only need a PEP if the eventual proposal is controversial. :-) Someone (Andrew Barnert?) has claimed that another name, like cut or trim, would be too confusing. I’m not sure I agree. I think strip_prefix is more confusing, and stripstr or strstrip would unnecessarily cut off the option of adding this to bytes. (Since bytes may be used for file names I think they should get this new capability too.) On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 16:10 Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:33:49PM -0800, Ethan Furman wrote:
I think we should have a `stripstr()` as an alias for strip, and a new `stripchr()`.
Shouldn't they be the other way around?
`strip` removes chars from a set of chars; the proposed method will remove a prefix/suffix.
And I'm perfectly okay with bytes() not having those methods. ;-)
If heavy users of bytes want these methods, they can request them separately. There's no backwards compatibility requirement for new string methods to be automatically added to bytes.
I guess the question now is do we need a PEP?
-- Steven _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/I2PNEQ... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-- --Guido (mobile)