On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:09:39AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 14 April 2017 at 04:20, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
> > Long ago, when the operator module was first introduced, there was a
> > much stronger correspondence between the operator.__dunder__ functions
> > and dunder methods. But I think that correspondence is now so weak that
> > we should simply treat it as a historical artifact.
>
> +1 from me, with this rationale. The specifics sounds pretty good to
> me, too - happy to review a PR if you put one together :)

http://bugs.python.org/issue30085

For some reason, Github won't allow me to log in at the moment. It keeps
insisting I need to enable cookies, even though I have. Perhaps it
doesn't like my browser? I'll have to try on another computer with a
different browser.

Terry, you had some nice suggestions for wording. If you want to submit
a PR, feel free to take over the issue. I probably won't get a chance to
do any more on this for a week.



--
Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/