![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/cc8e4e3e131636322f062cd3c09e1e35.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
April 14, 2016
12:41 p.m.
On 14/04/16 20:22, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
An argument for operators "+" and "-":
result = expr1 + expr2
is syntax error, while
result = expr1 + expr2
is silent bug.
Interesting. But that bug potentially exists regardless of what PEP8 says. This seems to me to be something that should be tackled separately. I imagine that there are versions of 'expr2' that makes this a valid and useful construct (which is why it remains) - if I've missed some historical discussion on this then please refer me to it, I'd like to understand what I'm missing on first glance. Thanks, E.