I agree with Ivan. This feater is stands in contradiction with second Python Zen principle: "Explicit is better than implicit.". Isn't it? On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:41 AM <python-ideas-request@python.org> wrote:
Send Python-ideas mailing list submissions to python-ideas@python.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to python-ideas-request@python.org
You can reach the person managing the list at python-ideas-owner@python.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Python-ideas digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. TypeHinting: From variable name to type (Thomas G?ttler) 2. Re: TypeHinting: From variable name to type (Anders Hovm?ller) 3. Re: TypeHinting: From variable name to type (Robert Vanden Eynde) 4. Re: TypeHinting: From variable name to type (Thomas G?ttler) 5. Re: TypeHinting: From variable name to type (Ivan Levkivskyi)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:18:02 +0200 From: Thomas G?ttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> To: python-ideas@python.org Subject: [Python-ideas] TypeHinting: From variable name to type Message-ID: <2d9d1825-2619-e4a0-1b19-6a614666816a@thomas-guettler.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Imaging you are developing in the django context.
Everytime you use a variable named "request" or "response" your human brains knows that this is a subclass of django.http.HttpRequest and django.http.HttpResponse.
How to give the IDE this knowledge?
One solution is the do typehinting everywhere the veriable gets used.
But why does the human brain not need this?
Because it is intelligent?
I would not call this intelligence. There is a simple dictionary in the brain of the developer, which maps:
variable-name --> Type
And this mapping dict exists once per library.
If you are developing in the requests http lib, then there is a different mapping. Then "response" means type requests.Response.
Now my idea: Per module and/or per file type hinting from variable name.
Maybe a magic docstring in the __init__.py file:
""" variable-name-mapping: { request: django.http.HttpRequest, ... } """
This makes the type mapping available for all files in this directory (or sub-directories).
What do you think?
Disclaimer: For reasons I don't want to explain in detail, I am not allowed to do implement things like this. This is just an idea. I would feel proud and thankfull if someone likes it that much, that he implements it.
-- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:29:38 +0200 From: Anders Hovm?ller <boxed@killingar.net> To: Thomas G?ttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> Cc: python-ideas@python.org Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] TypeHinting: From variable name to type Message-ID: <3A295990-52A3-4347-865E-096E9126C6C7@killingar.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 19 Oct 2018, at 09:18, Thomas G?ttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> wrote:
Imaging you are developing in the django context.
Everytime you use a variable named "request" or "response" your human brains knows that this is a subclass of django.http.HttpRequest and django.http.HttpResponse.
How to give the IDE this knowledge?
One solution is the do typehinting everywhere the veriable gets used.
But why does the human brain not need this?
Because it is intelligent?
I would not call this intelligence. There is a simple dictionary in the brain of the developer, which maps:
variable-name --> Type
And this mapping dict exists once per library.
If you are developing in the requests http lib, then there is a different mapping. Then "response" means type requests.Response.
Now my idea: Per module and/or per file type hinting from variable name.
Maybe a magic docstring in the __init__.py file:
""" variable-name-mapping: { request: django.http.HttpRequest, ... } """
This makes the type mapping available for all files in this directory (or sub-directories).
What do you think?
I tried to implement this in mypy quite recently actually, but gave up for various reasons.
I am very much +1 on this. This would be a huge boon to preexisting code bases.
/ Anders
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:22:08 +0200 From: Robert Vanden Eynde <robertve92@gmail.com> To: Thomas G?ttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> Cc: python-ideas <python-ideas@python.org> Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] TypeHinting: From variable name to type Message-ID: < CA+msPNkhxXxCWkB4f_YbeR3oJQLNBWLGzvsOfouW+BQ7nonFyA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
That would be a feature in my "python dialect" future library. Taking one valid python program and producing another python program :
def f(request): return HttpResponse('ok')
?
def f(request: HttpRequest): return HttpResponse('ok')
The dialect options would include "all top functions in this module" for example, and parameters about the naming convention (explicit list of conversion or rules to create the mapping).
Le ven. 19 oct. 2018 ? 09:18, Thomas G?ttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de
a ?crit :
Imaging you are developing in the django context.
Everytime you use a variable named "request" or "response" your human brains knows that this is a subclass of django.http.HttpRequest and django.http.HttpResponse.
How to give the IDE this knowledge?
One solution is the do typehinting everywhere the veriable gets used.
But why does the human brain not need this?
Because it is intelligent?
I would not call this intelligence. There is a simple dictionary in the brain of the developer, which maps:
variable-name --> Type
And this mapping dict exists once per library.
If you are developing in the requests http lib, then there is a different mapping. Then "response" means type requests.Response.
Now my idea: Per module and/or per file type hinting from variable name.
Maybe a magic docstring in the __init__.py file:
""" variable-name-mapping: { request: django.http.HttpRequest, ... } """
This makes the type mapping available for all files in this directory (or sub-directories).
What do you think?
Disclaimer: For reasons I don't want to explain in detail, I am not allowed to do implement things like this. This is just an idea. I would feel proud and thankfull if someone likes it that much, that he implements it.
-- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/