On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 17:31, Svein Seldal <sveinse@seldal.com> wrote:
for x in (a for a in y if c):
-1 on this form, I know it's supported, but I can see it getting ugly, i.e. for x in (a for x in (a for x in a)) # add a few more "for x in (a" and it will get messy fast
or
it = (a for a in y if c) for x in it:
This seems more explicit, but does this not give us syntactic sugar for already supported use cases? -- H -- OpenPGP: https://hasan.d8u.us/openpgp.asc <https://t.mailpgn.com/l/?u=fbe9f93f-fd80-43c5-9866-4f515788cc99&fl=https%3A%2F%2Fhasan.d8u.us%2Fopenpgp.asc> If you wish to request my time, please do so using *bit.ly/hd1AppointmentRequest <https://t.mailpgn.com/l/?u=ef691519-2071-46a7-ad52-381462e771f4&fl=http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fhd1AppointmentRequest>* . Si vous voudrais faire connnaisance, allez a *bit.ly/hd1AppointmentRequest <https://t.mailpgn.com/l/?u=07d0ad86-434b-4af5-a4a1-4a036a47cd02&fl=http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fhd1AppointmentRequest>* . <https://t.mailpgn.com/l/?u=b5bad592-b977-4c0e-a77f-f17d51c6ee46&fl=https%3A%2F%2Fsks-keyservers.net%2Fpks%2Flookup%3Fop%3Dget%26amp%3Bsearch%3D0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1>Sent from my mobile device Envoye de mon portable